The Italianization of Puerto Rico

Dis­man­tling a pub­lic edu­ca­tion sys­tem in a coun­try with strong back­ground of polit­i­cal strug­gles requires a mit­i­gated form of neolib­eral strat­egy. Shut­ting down a whole lan­guage depart­ment, which is hap­pen­ing at SUNY Albany, is some­thing you can do in cer­tain areas of the United States. But it is a whole dif­fer­ent story in a hot and par­tic­i­pa­tory place like Italy. In a sit­u­a­tion where active unions and a strong pop­u­lar move­ment still have a say in pub­lic poli­cies, one can­not launch a blitzkreig. What is needed is a longer and murky war of posi­tion. Thus var­i­ous cen­ter-right gov­ern­ments, with the com­plic­ity of the cen­ter-left, embarked since the 1990s in a long-term project that aimed at pro­gres­sively cut­ting off key resources from pub­lic edu­ca­tion (while financ­ing the pri­vate Catholic sec­tor) so that the whole edi­fice would even­tu­ally crum­ble under the weight of its own (appar­ent) con­tra­dic­tions. At that point, they sim­ply need to sug­gest that the pub­lic sys­tem is inef­fi­cient and ulti­mately unpro­duc­tive and voilà! Who could deny the crude real­ity of the fact?

If the Ital­ian penin­sula dis­plays the last stage of this drama, a sim­i­lar – yet per­haps more rapid – oper­a­tion has been car­ried out in Puerto Rico in the last three years. Between 2009 and 2010, I observed this oper­a­tion as a new pro­fes­sor at the Uni­ver­sity of Puerto Rico. The new right-wing gov­er­nor, Luis For­tuño, ini­ti­ated the process I had already seen com­pleted in Italy by frontally attack­ing the lower classes, the true source of his oppo­si­tion. This hap­pened through the infa­mous Ley 7 that fired about twenty thou­sand pub­lic employ­ees in a mat­ter of a few months. In 2010, the time was ripe to begin grind­ing down the pub­lic uni­ver­sity sys­tem, one of the largest pub­lic sec­tors on the island and the last strong­hold of a once fer­tile tra­di­tion of pro-inde­pen­dence and social­ist thought.  With the dras­tic reduc­tion of state sup­port for the uni­ver­sity bud­get, the true rev­enue for higher edu­ca­tion in Puerto Rico, the newly appointed bureau­crats (all polit­i­cal nom­i­nees) enforced dra­co­nian mea­sures that crip­pled the insti­tu­tion. Tenure-track pro­mo­tions were frozen, funds for research elim­i­nated, con­tri­bu­tions from the employer to pen­sion funds were slashed away. After the tech­nocrats sam­pled the weak response of their oppo­nents – the pro­fes­sors – they hit the tough­est con­tin­gents: the uni­ver­sity main­te­nance work­ers, and stu­dents.

Employ­ees of the uni­ver­sity responded with a series of lim­ited mobi­liza­tions. In the spring of 2010, stu­dents instead opted for an indef­i­nite strike.1 The most con­tro­ver­sial point, a mat­ter that uni­fied stu­dents in their fight, was a pro­posal to levy an addi­tional yearly tax of eight hun­dred dol­lars for enroll­ment (the so-called cuota). The mea­sure was pre­sented by the pres­i­dent as the essen­tial step to save the uni­ver­sity from bank­ruptcy, but while the bud­get kept on shrink­ing in the fol­low­ing aca­d­e­mic year, the uni­ver­sity also refused to open its books and show how and where it was using the remain­ing funds gra­ciously made avail­able by the state. The reac­tions to these unfair and dis­crim­i­na­tory actions were imme­di­ate. The strength of the response was espe­cially noticed in a tra­di­tion­ally con­ser­v­a­tive cam­pus like Mayagüez – the tech­no­log­i­cal pole of the Uni­ver­sity of Puerto Rico. Ignor­ing the most politi­cized wing of the stu­dent body, who boy­cotted the ref­er­en­dum in fear of manip­u­la­tions by the admin­is­tra­tion, the major­ity of stu­dents cast their bal­lot in favor of the strike three con­sec­u­tive times. 2 A felic­i­tous case of pop­u­lar out­flank­ing of one’s own polit­i­cal avant-garde, the one-month-long occu­pa­tion of the Mayagüez cam­pus left a per­ma­nent mem­ory in those who par­tic­i­pated in it. Pick­ets were orga­nized so that ongo­ing activ­i­ties were tak­ing place at all time dur­ing the hot days of the protest. Par­tic­i­pants caught a glimpse the true mean­ing of a gen­eral strike, the moment when social norms and masked forms of oppres­sion break down, mak­ing room for new modes of con­vivi­al­ity, where a gra­tu­itous kind of social unity pro­lif­er­ates.

And yet, in the best Ital­ian tra­di­tion, dur­ing that sum­mer the uni­ver­sity admin­is­tra­tion staged a treach­er­ous coup de théâtre: it accepted the con­di­tions of the Stu­dent National Nego­ti­a­tion Com­mit­tee, declar­ing the rejec­tion of its increase in tuition, only to enforce it a few weeks later when stu­dents had returned to the class­room.3 It was a per­fect maneu­ver, which used trick­ery to spread a sense of impo­tence among the move­ment. Only in the main cam­pus of San Juan did stu­dents deploy a vig­or­ous and con­tin­u­ous oppo­si­tion. But as the uni­ver­sity – notwith­stand­ing the oppo­si­tion of the pres­i­dent, José Ramón de la Torre, who on this account later resigned – mil­i­ta­rized the cam­pus the move­ment lost that wide­spread mobi­liza­tion that affected the whole island only few months before.4

Mean­while, the ones who could have replaced the stu­dents, keep­ing alive the hope for an oppo­si­tion against the destruc­tion of higher edu­ca­tion in Puerto Rico – the pro­fes­sors – remained silent. Dur­ing the occu­pa­tion, a minor­ity of pro­fes­sors with ties to the union (APPU) actively sup­ported the stu­dent move­ment. But as stu­dents were defeated, they had gained no con­sen­sus among the rest of the fac­ulty. And yet the lat­ter had every rea­son to protest, for beyond the seri­ous impact these poli­cies had on instruc­tion, the fac­ulty could also notice how for­mer col­leagues were rapidly dis­ap­pear­ing while class­rooms began to over­flow. Those who had a mar­ket fled the island, but oth­ers, mostly hold­ing tem­po­rary posi­tions, van­ished as the 2010-2011 aca­d­e­mic year began. In the fol­low­ing months, the next most vul­ner­a­ble com­po­nent of the teach­ers’ work­force, inter­na­tional pro­fes­sors, was tar­geted as the usual pro­ce­dures for work­ing per­mits became almost impos­si­ble to com­plete. Here the most aston­ish­ing con­fir­ma­tion of the power of ide­ol­ogy took place. Although the large major­ity of the teach­ers, inde­pen­dently from their polit­i­cal affil­i­a­tion, were affected in one way or the other, they kept silent and went about their busi­ness as usual.

The back­ground of the teach­ing body at the Uni­ver­sity of Puerto Rico is sig­nif­i­cant. We could divide up fac­ulty in three large sets. The first one is com­posed of Puerto Rican nation­als, as well as Latin Amer­i­cans and Euro­peans, who obtained a PhD. in the United States. Here is where the stu­dents enjoyed the strongest sup­port. A con­sis­tent num­ber of these intel­lec­tu­als infused the body of the­o­ret­i­cal knowl­edge accu­mu­lated in the best North Amer­i­can insti­tu­tions with the praxis of the decades of strug­gle at home. Obvi­ously, not all of them were so devoted to the cause. A con­sis­tent part of this group was also either cyn­i­cally refus­ing any form of alliance with the stu­dents on account of some higher and more intel­lec­tual supe­ri­or­ity, or was implic­itly sup­port­ing the gov­ern­ment. Among these indi­vid­u­als the new cadres of the uni­ver­sity bureau­cracy were selected; they zeal­ously fol­lowed the pre­scrip­tions of the admin­is­tra­tion, opt­ing out of what was left alive in the uni­ver­sity.

The sec­ond ensem­ble groups US pro­fes­sors who were cat­a­pulted into an unfa­mil­iar real­ity that remained for­eign to them – although they usu­ally oper­ated in it quite effec­tively, at least from an edu­ca­tional point of view. Though the major­ity felt like they were liv­ing in another coun­try, they usu­ally denied that this ter­ri­tory is in fact a colony with speci­fic ten­sions and responses in and to social fights. More­over, accus­tomed as they were to the costs of edu­ca­tion at home, these pro­fes­sors saw no prob­lem in the impo­si­tion of the cuota. Over­look­ing at the dis­par­ity in incomes between Puerto Rico and the US, they at best adopted a clas­sic defen­sive cor­po­ratist posi­tion tac­itly sup­port­ing increases in tuition in the inter­est of the insti­tu­tion. This form of ide­o­log­i­cal preclu­sion pre­vented them from read­ing the com­plex­ity of the issues at stake, which also affected them as part of that com­mu­nity. They chan­neled their dis­con­tent into the usual reproach of Puerto Rico as just another Latin coun­try, where cor­rup­tion, bureau­cracy and protest cul­ture jam the whole social sys­tem and make it inef­fi­cient and chaotic. Only a few of them, those who knew their his­tory and pos­si­bly lived through sim­i­lar colo­nial dynam­ics in the US, avoided this ide­o­log­i­cal block­age and joined forces with the stu­dent move­ment.

The last group is formed by per­son­nel trained in the for­mer moth­er­land: Spain. Although the Puerto Rican polit­i­cal elite holds the pre­cious fruits of the Span­ish acad­e­mia in high regard, it recently had to real­ize that Span­ish uni­ver­si­ties no longer pro­duce the highly con­formist gen­er­a­tions of grad­u­ates they used to hurl out under Franco. Sup­port came also from this new and ener­getic guard of pro­fes­sors, but it was not strong and per­va­sive enough to win a major­ity among the fac­ulty.

To be sure, the rigid uni­ver­sity hier­ar­chy is very resis­tant to change, and has so far neu­tral­ized any reac­tions to the cur­rent sit­u­a­tion. Divided by national dif­fer­ences and stub­born ide­o­log­i­cal occlu­sions, the major­ity of the teach­ing fac­ulty is unlikely to take any col­lec­tive step to pro­tect their insti­tu­tion. As the admin­is­tra­tion rapidly saws away at the branch they are sit­ting on, along with any future safety net – the employ­ees’ retire­ment plan recently came under government’s atten­tion as well – they pas­sively wait for a new elec­tion. Lit­tle do they know that free­dom is some­thing you gain, and that you have to defend day by day. It will not be an illu­mi­nated sov­er­eign who will reestab­lishes peace and pros­per­ity. It will be up to the stu­dents, instead, to rise again, and, if not defeat the gov­ern­ment neo-lib­eral agenda, at least estab­lish firm con­di­tions for the new gov­ern­ment (what­ever it will be) to pre­serve the com­mon good of their uni­ver­sity.

1. The strike was sup­ported by the Professor’s Asso­ci­a­tion (APPU), the so-called Her­man­dad (uni­ver­sity main­te­nance work­ers) and other unions such as Puerto Rico Fed­eral Affairs Admin­is­tra­tion and the inde­pen­dent union of the author­ity of pub­lic build­ings (UIAEP).

2. Fol­low­ing the no-con­fronta­tion pol­icy that is enforced in the uni­ver­sity sys­tem after the bloody con­fronta­tions of the 1970s and 1980s, the Uni­ver­sity of Puerto Rico grants that if one of the major three branches (the fac­ulty, the stu­dent body or the employ­ees) calls for a strike, cam­puses shut down and classes resume only at the end of the strike.

3. See Leysa Caro González, “Reafir­man que la cuota va en enero próx­imo,” Primera Hora, Decem­ber 14, 2010.

4. See Cyn­thia López Cabán, “De la Torre exor­ciza sus demo­nios,” El Nuevo Día, May 25, 2011.

Author of the article

is the author of Biopolitics and Social Change in Italy: From Gramsci to Pasolini to Negri (Palgrave, 2011). He is assistant professor of Italian at Colorado College. Between 2009 and 2011 he taught at the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.

Please comment with your real name using good manners.

Leave a Reply